Here are a couple of timelines published about the Benghazi attack: http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/world/africa/libya-benghazi-timeline/index.html
, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-19587068
For sure, the drone saw most of the attack on the CIA Annex because it happened
after the drone got there. There also was footage from the consulate
before the security cameras got knocked out, which the Embassy in Tripoli should have been
monitoring. Do you really believe that there was no communication between
Clinton and Benghazi for 6 hours during an attack?
No satellite phones, no secure intranet connection, no communication of any
kind? If you do, why was the communication setup so poorly done, and who
was responsible for that? If you don't, Obama and Clinton did very
little. They sent an unarmed drone. As far as the risks of using
military force, I would have hoped that we learned enough from other terrorist
attacks that we scramble whatever we've got to support our people. We may
not be able to use them, but at least we would have the option. There
should have been fighter bombers overhead, ready to give support within
"hours" of the initial attack. It wasn't like the date was
picked at random. It was September 11.
If the Administration did not order any military help, then why
not? If they didn’t have any ready, then why not? BS about asking
permission from the Libyan government as if they had any control over more than
a small part of their country is a transparent dodge. They certainly
didn't control Benghazi
then, and from published reports still don't.
One final question: Given the Algerian natural gas facility terror attack
by Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, and the significant 9/11 date of the
Benghazi attack, can a rational person still maintain that it was just some
guys who decided to kill some Americans on the spur of the moment?
No comments:
Post a Comment