Isn't it about time to question liberal's
motivation in all of their verbal maneuvering? When liberals declare words and
subjects off limits, it's usually because they are losing the argument.
I think liberals like high crime because it makes
individual citizens more dependent on the government. That's why cities that
have been one party bastions of liberalism are mostly high crime, high poverty,
low education hell holes. If someone mentions an alternative, like vigilantism,
that implies people might be able to do without government, liberals declare
that even the words describing self-help are pejorative. Liberals want gun
control so they can make you vote the way they want. Vote wrong and the police
may not respond to your emergency call. Without a gun, you have no chance of
defending yourself.
Liberals say that you can't challenge anyone's
patriotism. I think that liberals mess up any war they manage, because it's in
their interest to make military spending look ineffective. Liberals need all of
the defense spending they can cut for domestic programs to make citizens more
dependent on government so they have to vote for liberals to continue the gravy
train.
Liberals favor teachers' unions over minority children.
For liberals, no escapes from failing public schools can be permitted. If
someone actually gets a decent education, they might be able to support
themselves without government help.
Liberals are taking identity politics to its
logical conclusion. It started out that if you voted your identity, the results
of government actions were irrelevant. Now, you can be guilty of crimes only if
you are not in a liberally favored identity group. As a straight white
Anglo-Saxon Protestant Republican Vietnam Era veteran, I can tell you I am not
happy about the prospect of identity justice.