I think negotiating with the Iranian Mullahs about
their nukes is going to be a far bigger disaster than Iraq. Coupled with doing
as little as possible in Syria after Assad used poison gas, the policy of
nuclear negotiations with Iran is pressuring the Saudis and Qataris to buy some
Pakistani nukes. It is also encouraging Israel to nuke Iran. The Chicago
Prodigy in Chief has no clue what he's doing. All he can say is Bush did it.
Even if it were true, what difference, at this point, does it make? What's our
Dear Leader going to do to mitigate the mess?
High value Iranian nuclear sites
are burred very deeply with a lot of concrete hardening. The only effective
non-nuclear weapon that can destroy these sites is a 30,000 pound bunker
buster. Israel does not have the capability to deliver a 30,000 pound bunker
buster bomb against the Iranian air defense system even if the US gave them a
few. F-16 airplanes can't destroy hardened targets with conventional weapons. I
agree that Israel is closely watching Iran, but the only way Israel can destroy
hardened Iranian nuclear sites is to use its nuclear weapons. I don't find the
prospect of nuclear war in the Middle East comforting. I also don't believe the
Chicago Hack in Chief is ever going to order a US strike on Iran, even if Iran
successfully tests their own nuclear bomb.