Brace yourself for a complete change of
tune in the Trump coverage. The Pravda Press slants everything in a way they
think will benefit the Democrats. Right now they want to sow as much confusion
as possible in the Republican primary. At the moment Trump gets a boost because
the media, rightly or wrongly, see him as less threatening or more divisive
than the other candidates near the top of the polls. It’s a bonus for them that
Trump draws big audiences, but the Pravda Press would cut him dead if he really
looks good to win the general election, audience or no audience. If Trump begins to flame out, lame stream
media will boost whoever they think is the next most divisive or least
threatening candidate. Once the
Republican nomination is settled, then whoever it is, including Trump, will suddenly
become the worst thing since VD. Since the general election "debates"
are going to be everybody against the Republican, it's good practice for the
front runner to have an everybody against him debate. Remember moderator Candy
Crowley's assist for Barack Obama in the 2012 debate when Benghazi was the
topic? She interrupted Mitt Romney to tell the audience that Obama had declared
the Benghazi attack an act of terrorism. In fact, that was definitely not true.
So don’t get lulled into a belief the Pravda Press has suddenly seen the
light. The reality is the Pravda Press
operates based on its prevailing ideology, even to the point of bankruptcy. The
reason FOX News is so roundly criticized is because they don't play the bias
game almost everybody else does.
Translate
A Call for Healing
Showing posts with label Election 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election 2016. Show all posts
Sep 20, 2015
Mar 29, 2015
The Irony of Jewish Mistrust for Evangelicals
The big question last week was why the Jewish vote was still going to Democrats given that the current administration is so hostile towards Israel. One answer was that the GOP alliance with Evangelical Christians made Jews nervous.
It's
ironic that the GOP alliance with Christian Conservatives feels threatening to
Jews. The alliance was born out of the government attempts to control church
sponsored schools and home schooling. The Evangelical Christians became
politically involved because state and local governments were harassing them.
They wanted religious freedom to go their own way. The Jewish view of this is
that the Evangelicals want to take over the public schools and force Christian
prayers into the classrooms. While that may have been true prior to 1964, it
certainly has not been their goal since 1976, and definitely is not today. My
insight on this comes from the fact that while I'm a Protestant, my grandfather
was Jewish and my wife is Jewish. I have talked to both sides and there's a big
misunderstanding here.
Feb 1, 2015
Big Government and War, Not Swearing Women, Hukabee
Women
swearing is not important enough to be talking about. The fact that we are
talking about it means that Huckabee is not presidential material. My
grandmother, a Methodist minister's daughter born in 1898 who grew up in Rifle,
Colorado, swore like a sailor, smoked, drank and taught me how to play poker
when I was an 8 year old kid. As far as I know, none of this was a threat to
the Republic.
The crises the country faces are big
expensive government at home and war overseas. Social issues are irrelevant to
our national survival. Worse emphasizing social issues costs us votes. Some of
the most conservative gun nuts I know are gay. Generally they vote Republican,
but they don't vote for social conservatives. Huckabee has nothing to offer on
anything that's important either to the economy or foreign policy. Therefore,
he should go back to work as a TV personality. In his spare time he should
watch Free to Choose TV and learn some economics.
As an Air Force veteran, I am
familiar with a concept called target servicing. Basically, you shoot first at
the most threatening targets. To me, the most threatening targets are Iran with
nuclear weapons, Jihadist terrorists and economic collapse brought on by
overspending. None of these is a social issue.
Huckabee’s view of the family is
nice but perhaps reverses cause and effect. The reason for the collapse of the
family is a welfare system that subsidizes family collapse. It pays more if
daddy ain't in the house. It pays more if nobody works. Once work requirements
were added, the welfare expense went down. If we restructure entitlements and
quit subsidizing idleness, we'll get less of it as well as prevent economic
collapse.
I don’t see how gay couples threaten
the family structure at all. All my gay
friends seem to want is middle class respectability and the rights and privileges
granted to married couples. If anything,
their desire for admittance to the structure of marriage shows their admiration
of it, not any desire to tear it down.
Oct 5, 2014
Romney 2016? No Way!
Romney didn't attack Obamacare in 2012 because he backed a
similar law in Massachusetts when he was governor. That's a big part of why he
lost. Romney's speeches, debates and ads failed to communicate his line item
vetoes of the final law to a political junkie like me, let alone the average
low information voter. Democrats successfully argued that Obamacare was a
federal adaptation of Romney's plan in Massachusetts. Romney never successfully
rebutted this argument. I think this failure to communicate dooms any comeback. Because of the optics of Romney's initial
support for a law similar to Obamacare, Romney was not able to make the most
effective argument against it. He could have said we tried this in my state and
it didn't work out. I will work hard to repeal it when I'm president. If he had
said that, Romney would be president today.
Romney can't convincingly argue that we need to limit
government because he believes government can do the job if it's under better
management. Romney in 2012 proved that he can't turn out the Republican base,
even against Barack Obama, the most left wing and incompetent president ever. I
don't see how any of this is going to be different in 2016 against Hillary the
Inevitable or Elizabeth the Native American Princess. Jeb Bush is out of touch
and has 100% bad name recognition. Scott Walker or Bobby Jindal or Mike Pence
or even Chris Christie would be a much better choice.
The current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue thinks he
can rule by decree. If you believe that the president can decide not to collect
taxes that are levied by law, as our Dear Leader did with the Employer Mandate
taxes, then it makes sense you think I'm needlessly paranoid. Enjoy the
unilateral legalization of all illegal immigrants complete with instant welfare
eligibility, coming soon after the election without benefit of Congress. For
the survival of the rule of law in this country, we really HAVE to win in 2016.
Let's not recycle our losers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)