Deroy Murdock
wrote a great article the other day about forcing the Democrats to vote on
spending cuts linked with other issues that give them a choice of angering
voters in general or their union base in particular.
I think this is a fabulous idea. If we want to take back the Senate and keep
the House, we have to have a narrative that's better than what comes off our
opponent's teleprompter. That means we
have to paint the Democrats as hopelessly under the corrupt influence of their
big campaign donors, the unions. We have
to have Democrats vote on the record on a lot of stuff they have to look bad on
in order to satisfy their union contributors. In addition to Mr. Murdock's spending cuts
coupled with popular programs, which are really great, immigration, education
and federal civilian worker pay would be other good areas to highlight.
The House should pass a stand alone guest worker program,
which should apply to both illegal immigrants already in the US and workers
who want to come here. They should also
pass an expanded H1B visa program as a stand alone bill, again open to anybody
without regard to current immigrant status. The Senate Democrats should have to explain to
Hispanics and Asians why they won't vote for either one. (Hint: Unions oppose them.) In education, cut the Education Department’s bureaucracy
enough to block grant a voucher program states can qualify for. This gives Democrats the choice of upsetting
the teachers unions or inner city Blacks suffering from atrocious schools.
On federal civilian pay, demands for embarrassing information are the way to
improve our narrative.
For example, have
the congressional budget office find out how much is spent on compensation for
the federal civilian workforce as a whole.
Also ask them to compute the full time equivalent number of federal
civilian employees.
At this point, a
simple calculation of expense per worker yields Democratic embarrassment.
The average voter can tell right away federal
bureaucrats are making more than he or she is.
Let the Democrats weasel out of this by explaining how many more
credentials federal workers have than the average worker.
It will sound stupid and elitist.
Even better, the information will allow the
House to pass a government wide freeze on the total federal civilian personnel
budget.
Our current freeze on the pay
structure can be beaten by promoting everybody so the total spent rises even
though the salary for every pay grade remains frozen.
If we freeze the current personnel budget,
pay grade creep no longer works.
Some might say that these tactics will remove any chance of
bipartisanship. With a Chicago Democrat
in the White House, how can we expect bipartisanship? Having lived in Cook County
over half of my life, I have to say that Obama "negotiates" just like
Democratic Chicago Mayors or Cook County Commissioners negotiate with
Republicans. They do a nice reach-out
photo op followed by a closed door meeting where they dictate the terms of
what's going to happen. The Republicans can like it or lump it. There is no bipartisanship involved in Chicago and there is none
in the White House either. It's just
never going to happen, no matter what.